Let's say you want to pass along some really important information to future generations. What's the best way to insure that your message will survive for, say, 500 or 1000 years? CRN blog reader Tom Mazanec has an idea for something he calls "Permapaper."
Permapaper is a matrix of fullerene fibers, integral with the binding of the book of which they are a part. The fibers are cladded with a tightly coiled sheath of sapphire in various colors to give the printing and illustrations. The fullerene provides the tensile strength to make permapaper virtually tearproof, and the sapphire sheath is fireproof at chemical combustion temperatures, requiring at least an electric arc furnace to destroy. It is also resistant to most corrosive chemicals. The permapaper does not absorb fluids, so it is quite waterproof and stainproof. The hollow fullerene fibers lower the density to the point that a book of permapaper will float on water and not sink to the bottom.
Tom says this approach might be used, post-nanofactory, by bibliophiles or survivalists who wish their books to "last the ages" and want something that will survive the vicissitudes of time and chance better than paper or plastic.
So bring on your famines, fires, floods, wars, and plagues -- we've got permapaper!
Tags: nanotechnology nanotech nano science technology ethics weblog blog
I wrote post last year about Historic Changes in the very study of history itself. With human knowledge growing exponentially, is the problem really the durability of media? It seems the problem will be more one of knowledge drowning in obscurity (as Tim O'Reilly, Cory Doctorow often talk about) than decaying from neglect.
"Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" --Linus Torvalds.
Posted by: Nato Welch | May 22, 2007 at 05:59 PM
The memory diamond idea has some merit, abet the need to be able to actually extract digitally the info first, or it'll just be something resembling a shinny rock.
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2007/05/shaping_the_future.html
Posted by: Tristan Hambling | May 22, 2007 at 06:01 PM
Cool idea - but might the nanotubes still degenerate (i.e. bonds break and re-form differently) if it were dumped in a fire?
Posted by: Tom Craver | May 22, 2007 at 07:16 PM
Some bonds will disintegrate in a fire, some won't. I have heard that buckytubes can survive an ordinary fire.
Chris
Posted by: Chris Phoenix, CRN | May 23, 2007 at 08:46 AM
I can't believe I forgot this:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070519/2/13iba.html
Some researchers are storing data in bacterial DNA. So long as the bacteria stay alive and reproduce, the data survives. Mutations are rare, so a culture of bacteria serve as a built-in checksum. :)
Data integrity through massive redundancy seems to me to be a much cheaper and more effective technique than trying to preserve just one instance of any given data.
Posted by: Nato Welch | May 23, 2007 at 01:48 PM
Yeah, but -- Nato, I think part of the point of the permapaper proposal is to preserve information in a medium potentially accessible after a general collapse of civilization through any of several possible disasters. Chances are better that a post-apocalypse society will be able to read a book than to access data stored in DNA!
Posted by: Mike Treder, CRN | May 23, 2007 at 03:39 PM
Hmm - how about programming algae to self-organize to display information encoded in their genome? Pond scum with a message!
Posted by: Tom Craver | May 23, 2007 at 06:07 PM
The algae would be good for sentences like "The Earth circles the Sun." or "All things are made of atoms." (and we could do this in parallel), but I was thinking more the Encyclopedia Britannica or the complete corpus of Hindu holy texts.
Posted by: Tom Mazanec | May 24, 2007 at 09:03 AM
"The memory diamond idea has some merit, abet (sic) the need to be able to actually extract digitally the info first, or it'll just be something resembling a shinny (sic) rock."
We can do OCR. We could also encode the data in any number of ways, from Morse code to Braille to a buckytube CD -- and I'm sure there are ways I haven't thought of. I'm not worried.
Posted by: Kennita Watson | May 25, 2007 at 12:07 PM
Mike - That's right. We have to write down the instructions on how to build the microscope and the DNA sequencing techniques somewhere.
Now, let's just hope they don't forget how to read the language we wrote it in...
;p
Posted by: Nato Welch | May 28, 2007 at 11:55 AM
English might actually be good. The Mormon Church uses English, IIRC, and their meme of "preparedness" might make them good candidates for a surviving Church after a Collapse. English id almost like Latin in this respect, as well as being close to a "Universal Language".
On a related not, see http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_31_16/ai_64566668
Posted by: Tom Mazanec | May 31, 2007 at 07:11 AM