• Google
    This Blog Web

October 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

RSS Feed

Bookmark and Share

Email Feed

  • Powered by FeedBlitz

« Debating Nanotech Laws | Main | Robot Redux »

January 18, 2006


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike Deering

As long as we are only talking about regulating the "uses" of MM and not the ownership or the development, then I think you could get some interest by those in a position to make regulations happen.


Would somebody care to enlighten me as to why nanoperticles need new laws for regulation? Last I checked, a newly designed substance (or a known substance which particles have been nano-sized) that has novel properties has to be tested for effects, period. What exactly has changed since then?

Chris Phoenix, CRN

AFAIK, known substances don't necessarily have to be retested when they are made in a new size. I think there have been several cases of manufacturers saying "Well it's just carbon" (for buckytubes) or "well it's just titanium dioxide."


The comments to this entry are closed.