It Is Not Possible
Not Necessarily Relevant Quote of the Week:
Rail travel at high speed is not possible because the passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia.— Dr. Dionysus Lardner, University College, London (1830)
Tag: quotes
« Draft Roadmap Released | Main | Two Disappointing Novels »
Not Necessarily Relevant Quote of the Week:
Rail travel at high speed is not possible because the passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia.— Dr. Dionysus Lardner, University College, London (1830)
Tag: quotes
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
What is NOT possible is getting a PAID JOB anywhere in this world, especially the United States. All employers and jobboards
are liars.
Posted by: Dr John Michael Nahay | November 04, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Maybe you are demanding too much money.
Posted by: Rip | November 04, 2007 at 12:39 PM
What is NOT possible is seeing molecular manufacturing arrive before 2075.
Posted by: MysticMonkeyGuru | November 05, 2007 at 10:45 PM
Not Necessarily Relevant my hiney. :)
Posted by: Jan-Willem Bats | November 06, 2007 at 01:07 AM
OK, I'll byte:
MysticMonkeyGuru: Is it 100 years, or 68, before we'll see an ad-hoc nanoscale construction capability? Why is there a ~33% differential in your comments on "To Invent a Nanomachine" and this thread? What is your proof? *curious look*
Seriously, I'm curious to know what you're basing your position on.
-John B
Posted by: John B | November 06, 2007 at 11:22 AM
While I expect MMG chose 2075 simply because it's likely beyond our lifespans, let's consider - what factors actually might significantly delay atomically precise manufacturing (APM)?
MEMs has had technical challenges, but I believe its relatively slow rate of progress has been due more to sparseness of markets for devices of limited complexity. It faced a chicken-egg problem: large markets for MEMS might develop if it sufficiently complex devices could be built - but getting to that point would take a lot of investment, and that investment was not available because MEMS was too far from being able to create highly complex devices.
That clearly could apply to APM. On the other hand, if MEMS can get past that barrier, it might initiate a financially supportable path to APM. (E.g. surgical micro-bots might be profitable enough, and clearly could create demand for smaller and more capable devices.)
Posted by: | November 06, 2007 at 11:26 AM
MMG is Jan-Willem Bats -- a troll on every forum he infects.
He'll never respond to your questions guys.
Posted by: Rip | November 08, 2007 at 08:18 PM
So you are saying Jan-Willem Bats is responding to his own postings as MMG ? This is possible, I knew a guy in high school who debated himself via letters to the editor of a newspaper. JWB, our technological future site, which is linked from Crnano seems reasonable. I would not want to tar JWB if he was not MMG. Did you have some proof, that they are the same ?
Posted by: Brian Wang | November 09, 2007 at 01:29 PM
Oops! I am wrong. MMG is ADBatstone, someone else entirely.
I don't know how I confused the two -- sorry about that.
Posted by: Rip | November 09, 2007 at 08:55 PM
My comment didn't seem to go through last time, so I'll repost real quick.
I was wrong -- MMG is ADBatstone, someone else entirely. The "Bats" confused me... sorry about that!
Posted by: Rip | November 09, 2007 at 09:02 PM
I'm not MMG.
MMG hates my guts and has tried vandalizing the comments section of my site in the past with his nonsense.
But yeah, I can see how you screwed up the Bats thingy so no worries about it.
Posted by: Jan-Willem Bats | November 12, 2007 at 03:10 AM