• Google
    This Blog Web

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

RSS Feed

Bookmark and Share

Email Feed



  • Powered by FeedBlitz

« The Nanobots Are Coming | Main | The Future of Warfare »

Bringing Back the Dead

Lately I've seen some interesting discussion about the qualitative value of science fiction to inform our understanding of the future. For example, check out this thread:

Has reading and writing SF changed your world view? And if so how?

Now, news comes from Germany about an ambitious effort at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology to "complete a first draft of the Neandertal genome within the next two years."

Skull

Reading this account, I couldn't help but think about the excellent Hominids/Humans/Hybrids trilogy by Robert Sawyer, as well as Neanderthal by John Darnton (only so-so), and, to a lesser extent, Relic by Doug Preston and Lincoln Child (good but not great). Of course, the idea of deciphering (and revivifying!) a genome of an extinct animal was probably best realized in fiction by Michael Crichton in Jurassic Park.

I'm not suggesting, naturally, that the scientists in Germany have any intention of making a test tube Neandertal baby, but if I were a novelist.....

Anyway, it's my belief that good science fiction -- in fact, any kind of good story-telling -- can be very helpful in expanding and clarifying our concepts of what is possible and what we should try to prepare for. We're still waiting for the first really illuminating novel about the introduction and proliferation of personal nanofactories, although Neal Stephenson's superb Diamond Age does have a lot to offer.

Mike Treder

CRN Home Page
Tags:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

While many technologists are hooked on tech early on due to sci-fi, there's also lots of 'poor tech' out there in those same books. Even 'hard' sci-fi has its occasional blooper.

However, I think it is a very useful thing nonetheless, as most fiction (at least the 'good stuff') is at least as much about the people who use the technology as it is about gee-whiz gadgets. And people make all the difference in the acceptance, disapproval, use, and/or abuse of any given technology. GM foods being a 'classic' example, as well as the ongoing theme of Shelley's Frankenstein.

-John B

PS - How about Stross' Accelerando for another novel with nanotech and personal nanofactories being of critical import?

The comments to this entry are closed.

SUPPORT RESPONSIBLE NANOTECH


  • Even a small contribution will make a big difference!

  • Donategsmed

  • CRN is affiliated with World CareĀ®, an international, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization.

BLOGROLL