• Google
    This Blog Web

October 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

RSS Feed

Bookmark and Share

Email Feed



  • Powered by FeedBlitz

« Nanotechnology Timeline | Main | How Science Really Works »

January 24, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451db8a69e200d8345ec85269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Deep-sub-wavelength Microscope Demonstrated:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Chris Phoenix, CRN

... And twelve hours after I posted this, I stumbled upon a mention of a company, NanoSight, which has apparently developed a sub-wavelength imaging capability to the point that they have movies of 20-nm particles, taken with an ordinary microscope and video camera. They aren't saying how it works, but it seems to image in a thin plane, and is apparently purely optical--no electronic image processing. They say it can be mounted on the stage of standard optical microscopes, and sold for a fraction of the cost of the microscope.

Chris

Kurt

Yeah, if this technology can be developed, it will make someone alot of money. The money is in the slides, not the scope itself, just like microarrays (biochips).

Assuming that this works, SEMs go away except for niche markets like wafer inspection, where the processing is done in vacuum to begin with.

Nanosight was supposed to release their product last year. So far, they have yet to release their product to market.

Chris Phoenix, CRN

I'm not sure SEMs go away entirely. It looks like this technology can only image a plane. SEMs can handle 3D structures.

AngstroVision, on the other hand, looks like something that could make SEMs go away. But they haven't shipped product or even updated their website for a couple of years.

Chris

The comments to this entry are closed.